Skip to main content

Getting Our Feet Wet

This is the second in a series of posts by our intern Jeff  Jaureguy.

Day 2
June 26, 2016
Ed on the finer points of beating-sheet collecting.Creative Commons License
Sunday morning and still no electricity in the hotel due to the storm from the previous night.  Loaded the cars and headed out to on our first field site at the Namekagon River in Bayfield County SACN.  We split into two groups to explore under a bridge nearby to collect samples.  I scavenged the cement wall directly under the bridge near the stream and found many dead samples of stoneflies within spider webs. 
After this bridge excursion we headed to the park area where there was an entrance into the river.  Dr. DeWalt brought out dip nets and beating sheets and taught us how to use these tools properly to collect the insects.  Dip nets are used to collect aquatic insects on the bottom of the river floor while being submerged in the water.  After using the the dip net, the contents are poured into a tray to sift through and pick out the aquatic insects of varying species.  Beating sheets are a diamond shaped sheet used to collect insects off plants by beating the plants with a short stick until the insects fall onto the sheet, after the insects are stunned we use forceps to pick up the insect and preserve it in a bottle of ethanol.  Completed the collection for the day and filled up two bottles of ethanol with a multitude of different species. 
Evan, Jeff, and Alex emerging from the water.Creative Commons License
I really enjoyed learning how to use these collecting tools, there is a such an art and finesse to collecting that takes many years to master.  It turned out to be a very long day after the morning and night collecting, can’t wait for more adventures, but now to get a little shut eye. 


Popular posts from this blog

Insect Frenzy

This is the third in a series of posts by our intern Jeff  Jaureguy.

Day 3 June 27, 2016

         I was spoiled this morning with an amazing Norwegian breakfast called  a smothered omelet lefse wrap at the Norske Nook.  Who would have known this beautiful gem would be in such a small town.  We packed the car and headed out of the town of Hayward towards our next field site in Washburn county on the Namekagon River at Lat: 46.02739, Long: -92.01258.  This was a very large river about 80 m wide and had a blackish brownish color.  I ended up using a dip net the whole time scouring the river for aquatic insects.  I found a lot of caddisfly pupae and casings on the bottom of the river along with some local fish, my first catch!   The next site we collected at was in Burnett county at the St. Croix River at Lat: 46.07568, Long: -92.7077.  This location was a very large sinuous river with a dark brown color to the water.I collected samples using a beating sheet and stick in the river.I found a…

cc0 vs. the world

Today I had some discussion that stirred up my desire to say, in a loud voice: "But look here, if it is credit you want, then the best way to get it is if your data are cc0, it's even better than cc-by!" So I tweeted:
#informatics need a study. If a dataset/paper is CC0 does it increase the *citations* relative to *any* more restrictive CC (I suspect so).
— Matt Yoder (@mjyoder) July 30, 2014 TL;DR There are lots of hints, but apparently no direct studies that address this.

Two important bits of clarification based on my original thoughts. I was only interested in cc licensed data. I was not asking whether cc0 data is reused more than other cc- data, just whether cc0 data gets *cited* (yes, citations = bad metric, so use a generic "pointed to" perhaps) more than other cc- data, particularly cc-by.

The basic premise is that the best way to (ultimately) bring focus to your work is to make it completely free, and that this will bring more attention, in the lon…

The St Croix River